Identify the grounds
Absolute and relative grounds need different evidence and arguments.
Instruct our Istanbul office to assess and prepare an appeal against a Turkish trademark refusal for you or your client. Send the full decision and notification details for a scope and fee quotation.
Send the complete TÜRKPATENT refusal decision and its notification date. We check the grounds, affected goods or services and whether an administrative appeal is available.
Ask us about your case →Usually counted from the date the decision was notified. This is the administrative appeal period for a national TÜRKPATENT decision; a final board decision has a different court route.
Official source ↗Calendar-month estimate only. Official notification, service rules, non-working days and any special procedure may change the final day. We confirm the deadline from the actual file; do not rely on this tool for filing.
A refusal appeal should address the reasons given in the decision and the goods or services affected. Send the complete decision and its notification details so the grounds, supporting evidence and response deadline can be assessed together.
Absolute and relative grounds need different evidence and arguments.
The document and notification date determine the response window.
We explain the options and scope before taking instructions.
The full decision, notification date, mark and application number. We can request further evidence after reviewing the matter.
Email the documents →The full decision and notification details help identify the grounds and any response window.
No. We assess the facts and explain the available arguments and limits before instruction.
The reason for refusal determines the useful argument. Distinctiveness, descriptiveness and earlier-right objections require different analysis. We consider the actual mark and specification alongside the decision rather than relying only on the class numbers.
A descriptiveness objection concerns the meaning of the sign for the relevant goods or services. An earlier-mark objection concerns the cited rights and relevant scope. These call for different evidence and arguments; the same appeal text is not suitable for every refusal.
An appeal challenges the decision on the existing application. A new filing may address a different sign or commercial scope, but does not automatically remove the original obstacle. Compare the refused items, merits, costs and available procedural route before instructing either option.
Review the grounds and procedural stage, explain the strengths and limits of possible arguments, prepare the agreed appeal and report the resulting communication.
The quotation depends on refusal grounds, classes, evidence, translation and procedural stage.
For trademark refusal appeals in turkey, confirm the specific filing or response task and documents to be reviewed. The agreed quotation identifies professional work, applicable official charges, translation needs, taxes and payment currency; later stages require separate instructions.
The outcome can differ across goods and services. A further procedure or a revised filing may be considered after the decision, but neither should be treated as automatically overcoming the original grounds.
No. Foreign registrations may be relevant supporting context, but the Turkish decision is assessed under the applicable local requirements and the grounds actually raised.
Compare our Turkish IP services or send an instruction through your overseas IP firm.